Peter Aeberli

Peter D Aeberli

Barrister - Arbitrator - Mediator - Adjudicator

Chambers of Michael Parroy QC

Home

Profile

Case Notes

Published Articles

Papers

Fast Track
Arbitration

Contact

Links

Case Notes for the Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Law Journal

England and Wales

D J Walker (and others) v. Christoper William Rome (and others).
(England and Wales) High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court), Atkins J., 10th September 1999.

Award on Costs - no post Award interest sought or awarded on costs not paid by the ordered date for payment - cost awarded not paid by date ordered - whether court could, on application to enforce award as a judgment, order interest to be paid on the unpaid balance - s. 35A of the Supreme Court Act 1981 - the Judgement Act 1838 as amended - whether court's power to order interest under s. 35A ousted by ss. 1(c), 49(4) and 66 of the Arbitration Act 1996.

Back to Top Top

Ahamad Al-Nami v. Islamic Press Agency Inc.
(England and Wales) Supreme Court of Judicature (Court of Appeal), Waller, Chadwick LJJ., 28th January 2000.

Application to stay proceedings pending arbitration - s. 9 Arbitration Act 1996 - inherent jurisdiction to stay proceedings - principles that court should apply when deciding whether existence of arbitration clause and its ambit should be determined by the court or by an arbitrator - Birse Construction Ltd v. St David Ltd [1999] BLR 194 considered.

Back to Top Top

Birse Construction Ltd v. St David Ltd.
(England and Wales) Supreme Court of Judicature (Court of Appeal), Pill, Aldous, Ward LJJ., 5th November 1999.

Application to stay proceedings pending arbitration - whether court or arbitrator should determine question of whether a contract concluded which contained an arbitration agreement - s. 9 Arbitration Act 1996 - RSC Order 73 Rule 6 - whether question could be determined on affidavits.

Back to Top Top

AT&T Corporation and another v. Saudi Cable Company.
(England and Wales) High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court), Longmore J., 13th October 1999.

ICC arbitration - three person tribunal - person agreed by the parties as chairman failed to disclose non-executive directorship and shareholding in competitor of one of the parties - whether misconduct - whether breach of ICC Rules - whether ICC determination of challenge to arbitrator final - whether grounds for removal and setting aside of awards made by tribunal under ss. 1 and 23 of the Arbitration Act 1950 - tests for actual and unconscious bias considered.

Back to Top Top

Christine Wealands v. CLC Contractors Ltd and others
(England and Wales) Supreme Court of Judicature (Court of Appeal), Nourse, Mance, Mantell LJJ., 22nd July 1999.

Third party proceedings - application for a stay under s. 9 Arbitration Act 1996 - whether claims for indemnity and contribution gave rise to a dispute referable to arbitration - whether arbitration clause applied to claim for breach of tortuous duty - whether arbitration clause covered claims for contributory negligence.

Back to Top Top

Laker Airways Incorporated v. FLS Aerospace Ltd and another.
(England and Wales) High Court (Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court), Rix J., 20th April 1999.

International Arbitration - application to remove party appointed arbitrator on grounds of unconscious bias - s. 24 of the Arbitration Act 1996 - consideration of the test to apply on applications for removal - arbitrator practised from same Chambers as Counsel for the appointing party - whether grounds for removal of arbitrator for want of impartiality.

Back to Top Top

SC Rolinay Sea Star SRL v. The Owners of the Ship "Bumbesti" and others.
(England and Wales) High Court (Queens Bench Division, Admiralty Court), Atkins J., 21st June 1999.

International arbitration award - award concerned disputes arising under charterparty - vessel arrested as security for the claim in action on award - whether Admiralty Court had jurisdiction in rem to hear and enforce a claim to enforce an arbitration award by arrest of ship - s. 20(2)(h), Supreme Court Act 1981 - The Beldis [1936] P 51 (CA), applied - The Saint Anna [1983] 1 WLR 895 distinguished - whether vessel should be released because the Claimant already had sufficient security for its claim to enforce the award.

Back to Top Top

Minmetals Germany Gmbh v. Ferco Steel Ltd
(England and Wales) High Court of Justice (Commercial Court), Colman J., 20th January 1999

New York Convention Award - application for leave to enforce as a judgment - CIETAC Rules - Arbitration Act 1996, s. 103 - whether objections to procedural errors by tribunal could be waived - principles to apply when considering whether enforcement should be refused on grounds of public policy - Adams v. Cape Industries [1990] 1 Ch 433 applied.

Back to Top Top

Danae Air Transport Societie Anonyme v. Air Canada
(England and Wales) Supreme Court of Judicature
(Court of Appeal), Kennedy, Ward and Tuckey LJJ., 29 May 1999

Arbitration agreement excluding rights of appeal - award allocating costs - tribunal determining by award that Claimant had failed to beat Calderbank offer - whether based on a arithmetical error - whether such an error, if not admitted, was a procedural mishap - whether court could remit award under s. 22, Arbitration Act 1950.

Back to Top Top

Jitendra Bhailbhai Patel v. Dilesh Patel
(England and Wales) Supreme Court of Judicature
(Court of Appeal), Lord Woolf MR, Otton, Ward LJJ., 24 March 1999.

Application to stay proceedings pending arbitration - s. 9(3) Arbitration Act 1996 - whether application to set aside default judgment, for leave to defend and counterclaim and for consequential directions was a step in the proceedings to answer the substantive claim - whether stay should be granted.

Michaelides v. Wilkinson
(England and Wales) Supreme Court of Judicature
(Court of Appeal), Gibson LJ, Blofeld J., 14 April 1999

County Court small claims arbitration - whether the arbitrator erred in law or misconducted himself by refusing to admit relevant and potentially probative evidence.

Back to Top Top

Ominum De Traitement et de Valorisation SA v. Hilmarton Ltd
(England and Wales) High Court of Justice
(Commercial Court), Walker J., 24 May 1999

International arbitration - whether enforcement of award could be resisted on grounds of public policy - award by foreign arbitral tribunal enforcing contract whose performance was contrary to domestic public policy in its place of performance, but not contrary to the domestic public policy of either the country of the proper law and/or the curial law - whether award was contrary to English public policy.

Westacre Investments Inc v. Jugoimport-SDRP Holding Company, Beogradska Banka DD and others
(England and Wales) Supreme Court of Judicature
(Court of Appeal), Waller, Mantell LJJ. and Sir David Hirst, 12 May 1999

International arbitration award - suggestion that contract was illegal rejected by tribunal - whether enforcement could be resisted on grounds of public policy - whether alleged perjury by witnesses a ground to resist enforcement - whether court could open up the tribunal's findings of fact relating to illegality.

Back to Top Top

Charles M Willie & Co (Shipping) Ltd v. Ocean Laser Shipping Ltd, G Roussos Sons SA and another v. Charles M Willie & Co (Shipping) Ltd
(England and Wales) Queen's Bench Division
(Commercial Court), Rix J, 29 October 1998

Whether notice effective to commence arbitral proceedings - s. 34(2) Limitation Act 1980 considered - whether party to whom rights novated could intervene in existing arbitral proceedings - procedure considered - whether arbitrators had jurisdiction reconsider procedural ruling - difference between award and procedural rulings considered - whether arbitrators could make procedural rulings by award.

Caparo Group Ltd v. Fagor Arrasate Sociedad Cooperative
(England and Wales) High Court of Justice
(Commercial Court), Clarke J, 7 August 1998

ICC arbitration - s. 72 Arbitration Act 1996 - letter sent to ICC stating that request for arbitration should be rejected as there was no jurisdiction - whether this was taking part in the proceedings so as to preclude recourse to s. 72 - consideration of steps that might constitute taking part in arbitral proceedings so as to bar recourse to s. 72.

Back to Top Top

Egmatra v. Marco Trading Corporation
(England and Wales) High Court of Justice
(Commercial Court), Tuckey J., 28 July 1998

Arbitration award - application for leave to appeal - principles to apply under s. 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 - whether question of law includes a question of foreign law - application under s. 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 - whether refusal by tribunal to allow expert evidence to be adduced a serious irregularity.

Azov Shipping Company v. Baltic Shipping Company (No 2)
(England and Wales) High Court of Justice
(Commercial Court), Longmore J, 12 January 1999

Award on jurisdiction - challenge under s. 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 ordered to be determined by rehearing - application for security for costs of the proceedings in court - s. 70(6) considered - nature of court's jurisdiction - principles to apply in considering applications for security for costs.

Back to Top Top

Bankers Trust Company and another v. PT Mayora Indah
(England and Wales) High Court of Justice
(Commercial Court), Coleman J, 20 January 1999

Arbitration agreement - proceedings commenced in Indonesian courts including allegations that that the arbitration agreement ultra vires or not incorporated - court's power to restrain Indonesian proceedings - test to be satisfied when seeking injunctive relief to restrain proceedings in a foreign court - whether allegation that substantive agreement entered into ultra vires a company impugned an arbitration clause in that agreement - whether arbitration agreement in schedule to substantive agreement incorporated.

Brian Andrews v. John Bradshaw and another
(England and Wales) Supreme Court of Judicature
(Court of Appeal), Nourse, Mantell, Mance LJJ, 29 July 1999

Arbitration - arbitrator sought to require parties to agree his terms - whether letters written by arbitrator to party refusing to agree terms provided grounds for removal - s. 24 Arbitration Act 1996 considered - justifiable doubts about impartiality - test for bias in R. v. Gough applied.

Back to Top Top

Overseas

Re Corporation Transnacional de Inversiones SA de CV and others v. SET International SpA and others
(Canada, Ontario) Superior Court of Justice, Lax J., 22nd September 1999.

ICC Arbitration - application to set aside Award - application for a re-hearing - UNCITRAL, articles 18 and 34(2) considered - principles to apply in considering such applications - whether allegation that tribunal wrong in fact or law provided grounds for setting aside Award or for a rehearing - tribunal not ordering full disclosure - tribunal not ordering witnesses to give evidence - whether grounds to set aside award or order re-hearing - UNCITRAL, article 27 - whether ICC or tribunal should have discontinued proceedings where party alleged dispute had been settled - ICC Rules, article 17 - whether arbitration clause could be incorporated by general words of reference - UNCITRAL, article 7 - whether party's decision not to participate in arbitration provided grounds to set aside Award or entitled it to a re-hearing - whether that party should be given an opportunity to present evidence and submissions at re-hearing - UNCITRAL, article 25, ICC Rules, article 15.

Back to Top Top

Odebrecht Oil & Gas Services Ltd v. North Sea Production Co  Ltd and another
(Republic of Singapore) High Court,
Lee Seui Kin JC, 20 February 1998

Contractual provisions for interim expert determination - requirements for a valid notice initiating procedure - whether matters determined by the expert could be referred back to him for reconsideration.

Back to Top Top